A Ripe Old Age

[mishalak]

Nobody kept statistics about what people died of and when before the modern era. So I don't know why people still insist that the low average age of death was because of childhood death and if a person got out of childhood he or she would live to a ripe old age. Picking at random the kings from William I to Henry VIII in England and running the numbers I find that the average age of death, excluding those murdered or who fell in battle, to be 52 years of age and change.

And I'm not entirely sure excluding the violent deaths to be entirely legitimate. Life was a lot more violent than in modern western nations. If included that drops the average another two years.

It also seems from historical records that in their 40s men were considered old and not as able. Probably equivalent to what we think of people in the 50s today. And unless exceptionally vigorous a person in their 50s was quite old and about ready to be struck down by a serious illness.

So unless magic is common enough to take the place of medical technology I tend to fault fantasy that has people routinely living into their 70s as they do in modern times.

Comments

[magentamn.livejournal.com]

We don't know that cancer was uncommon. Some forms require modern medical tests and/or an autopsy to determine. And until recently, people were really squicked about cutting up dear old Dad to see why he died. From what I've read, modern public health - clean water, disposal of wastes away from sources of water, killing disease bearing insects - are more responsible for increased life-span than anything else.

[thette.livejournal.com]

We do know cancer was uncommon, because most people died from other reasons (and I'm not counting "wasting").

But yes, you're right about public health, and that's evident in parts of the world today.