A Very Silly Vote
Oct. 17th, 2007 07:41 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
mishalakI found this site, Evil Scale. The current rating of PETA is 3.85 rather good. This cannot stand! If you like silly voting things go give PETA the rating they deserve, at least 8 or higher!
I am amused that L. Ron Hubbard has a rating of 7.61 (rather evil) despite what is sure to be a campaign to rate him perfect by *cientoligists.
Update: Still rated as rather good at 3.94. However they now rank lower than Dr. Seuss (3.88). Though looking at the 100 most good list on the site they're still rated better than George Washington (4.08) and Ghandi (4.1)! Better than Ghandi! And Mr. Rogers (4.22) is way down that list too.
(Yes, this is a very silly website. But it amuses me to rail against PETA and for Dr. Seuss. Plus it makes for some nice 'what the heck were they thinking' reading.)
I am amused that L. Ron Hubbard has a rating of 7.61 (rather evil) despite what is sure to be a campaign to rate him perfect by *cientoligists.
Update: Still rated as rather good at 3.94. However they now rank lower than Dr. Seuss (3.88). Though looking at the 100 most good list on the site they're still rated better than George Washington (4.08) and Ghandi (4.1)! Better than Ghandi! And Mr. Rogers (4.22) is way down that list too.
(Yes, this is a very silly website. But it amuses me to rail against PETA and for Dr. Seuss. Plus it makes for some nice 'what the heck were they thinking' reading.)
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-17 04:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-17 04:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-17 10:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-17 11:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-17 11:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-18 06:45 am (UTC)The cause may have some merit, but their methods are just too nasty.
So...how evil should we rate you? ;-)