The Instant Message: A Young Nob's Game?

[mishalak]

I remember when the minute I turned on whatever instant message program was hot, AIM, ICQ, MSN, etc. I would instantly connect with people. And when I went to send an instant message I'd find a fair number of people who were available and would respond to an IM. Now... not so much. For every time I turn on GAIM, the client program I use, I will get a message once out of dozen or more. And the vast majority of people in my list never log on, have away messages set all the time, or don't respond when I send a message. I'm thinking perhaps IMs are one of those things that you do for a while and then grow out of. So if I wanted to keep connecting like that I'd have to keep working at replacing the people I connected with every few months or something.

So I am wondering if other people are having the same experience with instant messages. Does anyone IM you? Do you have about forty people on your list who never log on anymore? Do you feel like you should put the rest in a category for people who are constantly logged in but never available?

Comments

[gomeza.livejournal.com]

I think it's partly that the novelty is over, and partly it seems that almost everyone I know has become more busy and has less free time since the IM phenom debuted.

For myself, I no longer have any IM access at work, at all, and I'm trying to spend less time on the internet at all when I'm at home. I have too many meatspace tasks awaiting my attention.

[perlandria.livejournal.com]

www.meebo.com

[gomeza.livejournal.com]

Cool, I'll look into that.

[mishalak.livejournal.com]

I've never had a job (until now) where I would feel like I could have an IM service on at work. And I still have it off when I'm actually working.

If I was not out in the sticks I suppose I'd be wanting to be on the internet less and doing more things in meat space. With that in mind maybe I should be looking for other isolated rural geeks if I want to chat.