mishalak: Mishalak reading a colorful book. (Reading Now)
[personal profile] mishalak
What if, just what if, the majority of planets with complex life are not like Earth. What if instead they tend to be much higher mass on average? Earth's gravity is high enough that it might be physically impossible to build a space elevator. It is easy to imagine a world with a bigger gravitational well, a thicker atmosphere, and complex intelligent life that has never even visited its moon because the engineering problems are nearly or completely insurmountable. Could this be a part of the solution to the Fermi paradox?

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-27 12:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrteufel.livejournal.com
I believe they've run computer programs that show earthlike planets can form at any size. The necessity for life is considered to be liquid water, not planet size. And from what we know of planet formation (not definitive, by any means) it seems you get more small planets than large ones. Like there are more small stars than large ones.

Sorry.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-27 07:35 am (UTC)
ext_5149: (Default)
From: [identity profile] mishalak.livejournal.com
Poo. A lovely idea destroyed by boring old facts.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-27 07:36 am (UTC)
ext_5149: (Default)
From: [identity profile] mishalak.livejournal.com
But wouldn't planets smaller than Earth tend to go like Mars and lose heat, magnetosphere, and thus water sooner than larger planets?

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-27 12:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrteufel.livejournal.com
The tendency is there, but there's a big gap between Earth ( 1 Earth mass) and Mars (0.1 Earth mass). I think Earth would have been about 0.9 current mass before the thing that hit it to make the moon, did so.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-27 12:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrteufel.livejournal.com
http://www.amazon.com/Universe-Aliens-Everybody-Solutions-Extraterrestrial/dp/0387955011/sr=8-1/qid=1169859461/ref=sr_1_1/002-1213969-8972805?ie=UTF8&s=books

"Where is Everybody" is a good book on the topic.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-27 02:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pompe.livejournal.com
Bigger planets would likely be more watery, which might seriously limit life and civilization. No continents, no land, no normal geochemical cycle and odd water effects at the depths.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-27 07:41 am (UTC)
ext_5149: (Default)
From: [identity profile] mishalak.livejournal.com
Poo. Another arrow into my fun little idea. A universe where the Earth is near the bottom of the scale of planets with complex life. And so all these high gravity creatures don't turn outward as much.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-27 03:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pompe.livejournal.com
I recommend John S. Lewis's "Worlds without End" for an overview of the potential problems of small and big Earth-like planets. An easy and inspiring read from the early days of extrasolar planetary finding, but not very dated.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-27 04:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] boywhocantsayno.livejournal.com
Well, the Fermi Paradox includes the question of why we haven't detected radio transmissions from aliens, right? And even if an alien race couldn't engineer a means to leave their planet, they could still build radio transmitters which we might detect. So it may be part of the reason why we haven't been contacted, but it's certainly not the whole reason.

After all, we haven't ventured very far into space ourselves, so why assume that if there are alien races, they have a) gotten further out, or b) if they have gotten further out, that they came/are coming in our direction? We should still hear them, though.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-27 07:45 am (UTC)
ext_5149: (Default)
From: [identity profile] mishalak.livejournal.com
Only if they bother to point radio waves in our direction. If they're only using radio waves for local communication and as bleed off their electrical network there is absolutely no way we could detect them. And without being able to put things in space due the deep gravity well it probably would not be as convenient as putting something to signal outside the atmosphere. And there is always the, everyone's listening and no one is intentionally transmitting, problem.

But my idea has already fallen apart due to other problems with it.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-29 01:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vicarage.livejournal.com
Not true, early warning radar from the DEW line can be detected from a long way off by Arecebo type dishes, much more than the oft-toted I Love Lucy TV signals.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-30 06:00 am (UTC)
ext_5149: (Default)
From: [identity profile] mishalak.livejournal.com
How far off? I've never actually seen any numbers on how far off our radio signals could be theoretically detectable given enough time to get there.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-27 04:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] celtane.livejournal.com
Regarding space elevators, there's also this problem:

http://space.newscientist.com/article/dn10520-space-elevators-first-floor-deadly-radiation.html

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-28 04:32 am (UTC)
ext_5149: (Default)
From: [identity profile] mishalak.livejournal.com
Yet another barrier to getting into space inexpensively, joy. Perhaps we're close to that edge that makes spacegoing a worthwhile effort.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-27 01:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrteufel.livejournal.com
Please don't be put off theorising! I enjoy reading others theories on stuff. My blog's got all sorts.http://mrteufel.livejournal.com/37115.html

Profile

mishalak: A fantasy version of myself drawn by Sue Mason (Default)
mishalak

June 2020

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags