The Unintentional Tourist
Aug. 23rd, 2005 08:46 pmI wrote this on Sunday, but didn't get around to putting it in the computer until today.
I walked to the beach today. When returning from seeing a rice room in Richmond neighborhood (which I did not get into) I decided to walk through Gold Gate Park rather than just returning on the same bus I used to get out there. Somehow south of Strawberry Hill I got turned around and ended up reversing course without realizing it. About the time I started thinking "Boy it does not look this far across on the map," I saw the ocean and realized what I had done. Rather than just heading south to the J Line I decided to finish what I had started and walked all the way to the Pacific Ocean And that is how I managed to unintentionally complete my goal of visiting a BART or MUNI underground stop every day. And I totally blame overcast skies for getting turned around without realizing it.
Among other things I've been reflecting a lot on the nature of San Francisco. How bad is it that the city looks so shabby with the gum on the sidewalks, the graffiti in every commercial district and a bit around, and generally the way that so many people seem not to care about it. Marble floors with dirty puddles on them, human shit and dog shit just laying in the street, and the mentally ill and strung out trying to scam passers by for change. I thought about this particularly as I saw the homeless congregating about the UN Plaza in front of the baroque dome of the City Hall. High minded ideals about al nations coming together for peace being celebrated by monuments defaced by people who are protected by the city's high minded tolerance.
On the one hand it is just a look and a man can be king in an ermine robe or faded tee shirt. On the other there is a respect for self that comes with being dressed in a good suit, or even just a clean shirt, and I cannot help but wonder if San Francisco might be headed from being unloved because it becomes an expensive, ugly, and unpleasant town. Every time the comfort of the people, and I don't just mean taxpayers, is compromised in the name of security or because we cannot solve the problems we tolerate this becomes a less attractive place to live. From the bus "benches" no one can comfortable sit on put in to keep the homeless from sleeping there to the closed bathrooms because of a heightened state of security this place is not everything it can be. And I suspect part of the reason things like BART has not been extended through certain communities is precisely because it is unlovely and they see what this city looks like.
But in the end I do not know anything and my observations have no basis in systematic study and are thus hot air.
I walked to the beach today. When returning from seeing a rice room in Richmond neighborhood (which I did not get into) I decided to walk through Gold Gate Park rather than just returning on the same bus I used to get out there. Somehow south of Strawberry Hill I got turned around and ended up reversing course without realizing it. About the time I started thinking "Boy it does not look this far across on the map," I saw the ocean and realized what I had done. Rather than just heading south to the J Line I decided to finish what I had started and walked all the way to the Pacific Ocean And that is how I managed to unintentionally complete my goal of visiting a BART or MUNI underground stop every day. And I totally blame overcast skies for getting turned around without realizing it.
Among other things I've been reflecting a lot on the nature of San Francisco. How bad is it that the city looks so shabby with the gum on the sidewalks, the graffiti in every commercial district and a bit around, and generally the way that so many people seem not to care about it. Marble floors with dirty puddles on them, human shit and dog shit just laying in the street, and the mentally ill and strung out trying to scam passers by for change. I thought about this particularly as I saw the homeless congregating about the UN Plaza in front of the baroque dome of the City Hall. High minded ideals about al nations coming together for peace being celebrated by monuments defaced by people who are protected by the city's high minded tolerance.
On the one hand it is just a look and a man can be king in an ermine robe or faded tee shirt. On the other there is a respect for self that comes with being dressed in a good suit, or even just a clean shirt, and I cannot help but wonder if San Francisco might be headed from being unloved because it becomes an expensive, ugly, and unpleasant town. Every time the comfort of the people, and I don't just mean taxpayers, is compromised in the name of security or because we cannot solve the problems we tolerate this becomes a less attractive place to live. From the bus "benches" no one can comfortable sit on put in to keep the homeless from sleeping there to the closed bathrooms because of a heightened state of security this place is not everything it can be. And I suspect part of the reason things like BART has not been extended through certain communities is precisely because it is unlovely and they see what this city looks like.
But in the end I do not know anything and my observations have no basis in systematic study and are thus hot air.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-24 04:09 am (UTC)Sounds just like Denver...
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-24 04:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-24 07:33 pm (UTC)It is also a freewheeling San Francisco cultural thing, though "tolerance" isn't really tolerance.
As for BART, San Mateo County stopped it from going through initially; they didn't want the riff-raff from the South Bay (back when San Jose was small) riding transit through their county, so instead they got clogged freeways going through their county.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-24 10:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-24 11:11 pm (UTC)To be a San Franciscan is to be conflicted. There is the beauty of the city and its architecture, the fact that it's Gay Mecca, the nice neighborhoods, but then there's the squalor and the fact that so many people can't afford to live there. There are times when I think that San Francisco is uglier than New York, but the "clean-up" options and plans aren't palatable to many, and could impact the folks who can barely afford to live there now.
SF, after all, is talking about "low income housing subsidies" for folks who are making more money than I do...
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-27 12:24 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-24 06:41 am (UTC)OT: I have a new fanzine for you if you'd like it. What's your current address?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-24 06:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-24 07:59 pm (UTC)Well, based on lengthy observation, the real reason will be that the "certain communities" don't want undesirables (of social class mostly; but also race, ethnicity or gender preference) polluting the cleanliness of their segregated mini-homelands.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-24 08:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-24 10:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-24 10:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-25 05:06 am (UTC)I guess things change, though.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-26 03:17 am (UTC)