State Quarters
Jul. 28th, 2004 09:31 pmWith more than half the states done I think it is time to talk about the state quarters program. It is one of those 3am ideas; something that sounds totally brilliant when sleep deprived in the middle of the night and turns out less than fantastic in execution. The downfall should have been obvious (in retrospect). You see the states choose the design they want and invariably when opened up to the general public and committees of people who don't have any idea about art they pick something that sounds good and looks terrible.
It is the same reason that the state flags are so often indistinguishable from each other. They put so much stuff on their seal that everything on it is reduced to undistinguishable tiny blobs when put on a flag. I can just see some battlefield with state flags on it.
"Which side is that?"
"One of the states with its seal on a blue flag."
"Oh well that really narrows it down."
The worst so far, and this was a hard choice, was the Louisiana Quarter with an outline of the state, the Louisiana Purchase, a pelican, AND a trumpet. On an actual quarter it looks totally naff, even worse than it does on the US Mint's page. It is rather like trying to take a picture with too much stuff in the frame.
The rest at the bottom of the pack are Florida (a space shuttle, gallon, AND palm trees), Illinois (I can't even tell who's that supposed to be on a state outline probably Lincoln), Ohio (state outline again, kiss of death that is, with biplane and astronaut), New York (state outline again and the Statue of Liberty does not look good at that size), Pennsylvania (state outline and another liberty), and South Carolina (with state outline, state bird, state flower, AND state tree).
The best? Connecticut. It is the most memorable and very handsome. The only other up there that comes close to being as pretty is Mississippi with its spray of magnolias. States still working on theirs take note! They both put ONE thing on their quarter and the subject fills the space on the quarter.
It is the same reason that the state flags are so often indistinguishable from each other. They put so much stuff on their seal that everything on it is reduced to undistinguishable tiny blobs when put on a flag. I can just see some battlefield with state flags on it.
"Which side is that?"
"One of the states with its seal on a blue flag."
"Oh well that really narrows it down."
The worst so far, and this was a hard choice, was the Louisiana Quarter with an outline of the state, the Louisiana Purchase, a pelican, AND a trumpet. On an actual quarter it looks totally naff, even worse than it does on the US Mint's page. It is rather like trying to take a picture with too much stuff in the frame.
The rest at the bottom of the pack are Florida (a space shuttle, gallon, AND palm trees), Illinois (I can't even tell who's that supposed to be on a state outline probably Lincoln), Ohio (state outline again, kiss of death that is, with biplane and astronaut), New York (state outline again and the Statue of Liberty does not look good at that size), Pennsylvania (state outline and another liberty), and South Carolina (with state outline, state bird, state flower, AND state tree).
The best? Connecticut. It is the most memorable and very handsome. The only other up there that comes close to being as pretty is Mississippi with its spray of magnolias. States still working on theirs take note! They both put ONE thing on their quarter and the subject fills the space on the quarter.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-28 09:00 pm (UTC)Arkansas (http://www.usmint.gov/mint_programs/50sq_program/states/index.cfm?state=ar)' design I like too, despite the crowded images. That blasted gem sticks out. Arkansas quarters look their best brand new.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-28 09:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-29 12:08 am (UTC)However, for goofy commemorative money decided upon by committee, I think this (http://www.cnw.ca/images/rtphotos/Photo-3501.jpg) Canadian quarter takes the cake. It's a big cartoon Bullwinkle. Practically. Designed by an 11-year-old boy.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-29 05:38 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-29 08:45 am (UTC)state flags
Date: 2004-07-29 06:14 am (UTC)Re: state flags
Date: 2004-07-29 08:13 am (UTC)Re: state flags
Date: 2004-07-29 08:53 am (UTC)Re: state flags
Date: 2004-07-29 08:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-29 07:32 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-29 08:47 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-29 08:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-29 08:52 am (UTC)